Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - PaperBag

Pages: [1]
1
Cranial Restructuring / Re: Ineresting Pictures
« on: March 27, 2018, 01:23:06 am »
Bumping this thread because I've been obsessing about facepulling for days, specifically the Crane.
That before and after of the girl in front of the blue background is a patient of someone else, and she had surgeries that are unrelated to the concept of facepulling. http://drrichardjoseph.com/photos/112.php
What's the point of displaying someone who doesn't reflect the product being advertised?

Is the blonde girl up top the same person as the blonde woman on the bottom? I thought the photos were unrelated, but the whole website looks like something from 1998 so it's hard to tell and it makes what sounds like a good invention look very amateur when presented in such a clunky manner with little information to see.

2
Cranial Restructuring / Re: A post from Quora I made
« on: May 07, 2017, 09:17:37 pm »
Good post. It would be nice if people could realize that barring certain diseases, most "ugly" people are just lacking development. Unfortunately, lack of facial and body development are seen through the halo effect and anybody with these conditions is instantly labelled with bad personality traits before even having a conversation. I do it constantly, especially when seeing the worst photos of craniofacial dystrophy, thinking "he looks lazy, stupid, tired, untrustworthy", etc.. even though I've known better for quite a while.

3
Cranial Restructuring / Re: Handling your body
« on: May 04, 2017, 09:01:12 pm »
How can this help your face, specifically your jawline and cheekbones.  Most on the forum want to improve their facial appearance and bring the maxilla forward for more prominent eyes cheekbones and jawlines.  What exercise can you do with this therapy to correct the problem?

I assumed it was leading to something about unlocking the spine eventually helps the skull correct itself, but saw that the website has a section for "Endonasal Cranial Correction". Though there aren't many details given as to what it is, the results seem to be better than traditional NCR. Still, putting balloons up your nose sounds very dangerous, even if it's a new and improved method. How on earth is that safe?

4
Cranial Restructuring / Re: On scoliosis
« on: May 03, 2017, 02:17:37 pm »
I don't want this to sound like "just drop several hundred dollars" if it's not that easy for you to do, but the Gokhale chair helped me a lot with back pain, constant tightness, and severe coccyx/tailbone pain when sitting down. After using various special cushions and spinal aligning devices and getting nowhere, I found that being forced to sit properly in the chair corrected my back and took away a lot of pain, though it does begin to relapse if I take a break from sitting in it. This may not be relevant to you, as scoliosis is different, but the chair is at least worth taking a look at.

I think back problems are linked to CFD, at least I would say that the horrible posture it gave me accelerated my already deteriorating looks. On the other hand, Kurt Cobain had scoliosis from age 13 onward, and his face looked great for another 14 years despite always being slumped over. What gives? Maybe if you have a fully developed maxilla, it's far more difficult for it to go backwards even a little, compared to a face that was never fully supported to begin with.

5
Cranial Restructuring / Re: Diagnose my face - pics included!
« on: May 02, 2017, 09:29:31 pm »
No argument here. There are many people who aren't necessarily attractive but still appear vibrant, just like there are models who are attractive but resemble a statue because of their vacant stare or cold attitude.

It'd be intriguing to know if most people in these face communities are wanting results for the sake of health and unlocking their true looks, or if the underlying assumption is that being attractive would instantly cure their self loathing. Obviously, everybody should look good, I'm not disputing that. It is annoying when orthodontic patients or people who developed poorly rightfully object to their situation and say they were robbed, and it's met with "oh, you're just being vain! looks aren't everything", "you look just fine, what are you talking about?", or even odd defence mechanisms about attractive people having bad personalities like sainthood is directly proportional to having eye bags and sleep apnea, which is BS. We all deserve to be healthy and looking good.

On the other hand, it would seem as if some people are misguided and assume that their looks are responsible for every problem they've ever had. This can be seen in the vitriol spewed at attractive people for daring to say they're depressed or facing some other issue. (though I won't act as if there aren't a ton of people who fake and exaggerate their problems for pity or to come off as relatable) Many news stories about someone committing suicide is met with confusion when the victim was beautiful, which probably reflects others' thinking patterns of "my life would be great if I had *that*", that being looks in this case. I'm not trying to sound "blue pilled" or give off a "just-world" vibe because no sh*t good looking people have better lives than unattractive people, but I think it's mistakenly framed as the ultimate cure all.

Spoiler (hover to show)

6
Cranial Restructuring / Re: Ineresting Pictures
« on: May 01, 2017, 11:46:18 pm »
Yea this is all you need for the crane. Also, strangely im not surprised there are no before and after pics. The crane needs to be worn at night and i know for a fact peoples sleep habits are poor already. The lady i talked to said one has to teach his or herself to sleep on their back for this treatment to work. for the average person who curls up into a ball at night, sleeping on their back will most likely be so uncomfortable that they say **** it and give up. Throw a crane in the mix and forget it. BUT my hypothesis is once someone fixes their head posture and can sleep on their back without ANY PILLOWS (which i have done), the crane should would perfectly. Anyone who has the crane, is this wishful thinking or does this sound practical?

Was there anything that helped you adjust to sleeping exclusively on your back, or was it just a situation of forcing yourself to do it until it was natural? I practically sleep on my face, and can see how it'd be a huge challenge to lay flat up.

7
Cranial Restructuring / Re: Diagnose my face - pics included!
« on: May 01, 2017, 10:22:41 pm »
Thanks for being kind Tyler, and everyone else. I know we are hard on ourselves... but I feel better always changing and growing as a person all around, not just this one place. I've got a Phoenix mindset you know?

I forgot to mention in my post above that I wasn't referring to you or implying that your photos reinforced my constant judgement of people's faces. Not to be disingenuous, but you look pretty good despite the asymmetry and other things. Like, I see all of the issues that you've mentioned, but it's not disastrous. I was considering making a thread asking how women can have dystrophy and appear more harmonious than dystrophied men (smaller skulls? less reliance on needing a broad chin?), but the answer could probably be summed up in a single post.

Quote from: Tyler
I've been there too, heavy in the evaluation of others.

Actually, it's not easy to put into words how my outlook changed, but these past years, I have been striving to connect myself in conscious willingness to the creative, and striving to broaden my acceptance of other forms of beauty.

I have a somewhat longer face myself, and for a long time I was haunted by it because I could not accept its logic. I also used to see images of Sarah Jessica Parker, and let myself be influenced by the poison against her that's spread in the media, which in turn poisoned me against my own longer face type.

One day, though, I looked at her image from youth, and saw that she is actually highly beautiful, only the poor woman .. has likely been so run down through all of the vitriol spat in her direction, her once beautiful blue eyes have been turned dour and put off from their natural colour, and her face has become worn down. Yet in her youth, she was as beautiful as any queen, and everything looked prosperous in her face.

Around the time that I saw that, I looked to another image, of Liv Tyler the woman who played Arwen in the Lord of the Rings film, and it led me to the recognition that beauty is not a matter of a face being long or short or round or square, but rather very high proportional beauty and uniformity is in every face so long as the body is cultivated and purified. Both woman have a longer face, so it cannot be the length of the face that determines the beauty, but the health and cultivation and purity of the body that determines that. A favourite book of fairytales also taught me the same lesson, so then I deepened my recognition of the truth in reality.

It pains me badly (at the moment of writing) to see our Jessica in images still smiling through the poison vitriol that is spat her way through the ugly, dirty lies of the media. It just makes me so upset. But if it helps others to learn the truth, then there is at least a value in it, although I wish her a true and full recovery.

I looked up old photos of Sarah Jessica Parker, and she did used to be cute, but there's just as big of a chance that her appearance has gotten worse over time because of long faces having less support to them, so she could have ended up aging worse than ideally. Being the butt of infinite "horse face" jokes for years must be a factor, too, it's not like decades of being insulted wouldn't harm your psyche. A lot of SJP's newer photos have her wearing a ton of makeup around her eyes, so I can't judge any changes to her eyes too accurately. Going back to what I said to MeltedFace, I think women can "get away" with having lacking facial development, or rather, it requires severe damage for women's faces to truly begin to look "off" and Sarah in her earlier years is an example of that in action. Perhaps a better explanation or reasoning is women's neotenous appearance during their teens/twenties causes their lack of facial structure to not be as apparent (especially to people who don't obsess over maxillas 24/7), then as women get older, the divide between hot and not becomes extreme.

Liv Tyler is often used an example of an attractive long face, and I agree. She seems to have features that a typical long face doesn't, such as good eye support and full cheeks. IMO, she looks a lot like Danielle Haim from the band 'Haim'. They're a group of three sisters, all of whom have long faces and look kind of weird except for Danielle, though the other two seem to photograph better compared to being in motion.


Quote from: Progress
Very relatable. Learning to study faces can be really disheartening. On an instinctual level there is a huge difference in the vibe I get from mathematically proportional / harmoniously grown face (even if the features themselves are ugly) than when looking at a face with a disharmonious structure.

It's cruel to say, I know, but a great face gives an appearance of a wholesome and real personality, while disharmonious face feels off in a way that is almost physically draining. Harmonious and proportional faces give off the impression of a coherent and distinct personality, while disharmonious faces are "nobodies", as if you couldn't get a clear feel of their personalities.

The reason for this, I believe, is that biologically the brain is hard-wired to be able to automatically analyze a person's many facial characteristics that the combination of bone & soft tissue translates to in a proportional face. When the bone structure is weak, recessed and not properly aligned with the soft tissue, the brain will have a hard time analyzing the face. The proportions and shapes of the improperly grown face are different than what the brain has evolved to handle, giving the brain less usable information from which to construct the mental prototype of that person's personality, or vibe. This is why proper facial growth almost always gives off a distinct sense of unique personality and improper facial growth feels like a lack of personality.

Yeah, I fully agree with you on that. It's kind of funny and ironic that I know how bad my own face is (and am never not aware of it) but when seeing somebody with significant, horrendous dystrophy, my judgement switches from less of an innocent "noticing" of flaws to a type of contempt or shock and awe. You may be onto something with personality correlating to facial development - I have thought that for a while, but I like your explanation. I've never felt like I've had a real personality, and though the cause for that goes well beyond just looks, I remember being 8 years old and thinking my reflection in the mirror made me look totally lifeless. For at least 15 years before knowing about facial structure, I always thought I was uniquely ugly ("there are ugly people in the world, but I am a special kind of ugly") and looked like a general non-entity. At least partially because of that, I have a disconnect between the fantasy personality I constantly daydream of having/using and the boring, nothing-there drivel that comes out. I've never even been able to talk to family members without several filters on, resulting in never acting how I want or saying what I want, smiling is forced and unnatural, and feeling like a "nothing" as a result. That's obviously a huge mental issue and I'm fully aware becoming attractive wouldn't solve it, but it's interesting how all of that is perfectly captured in my face as well. Comparing my own face to various celebrities, they all have a certain spark to their face that becomes immediately apparent when looking at them. I think Justin Bieber in particular is a good example of what you said about the brain constructing a vibe by looking at someone's face. Regardless of him being classified by many as somewhat of a D-bag, I find his face very "simple" to look at, as if there's no decoding of his features to be done and it's easy to see his personality in a glance.

8
Cranial Restructuring / Re: Diagnose my face - pics included!
« on: May 01, 2017, 01:57:14 am »
I'd be interested, Tyler. I used to drink a ton of milk and can't say if my weak face ever looked better because of it, though my dental health was a lot better. Whether that was directly influenced by milk or eating better in general back then, I don't know.

How are you becoming able to see others' beauty? Since discovering claimingpower/this forum and the tropic premise in general a year and a half ago, I can't help but judge, evaluate, and categorize every face I see on TV and in public. It's disheartening to look around and see so many people who could look fantastic but didn't develop properly, so it feels like a stretch to attribute negative qualities as a unique trait or sign of individuality when those imperfections ideally wouldn't be there at all, if that makes sense. This is just difference of opinion, but I'd like to know how your perception of yourself is increasing because now that I know exactly what's wrong with me, getting complimented would feel extremely patronizing, although you unlocked some good looks a while ago, assuming your old face pulling results have held up.

9
Cranial Restructuring / Re: Ineresting Pictures
« on: April 30, 2017, 11:42:16 pm »
A modified retainer would be preferable, if that could be used instead of the ALF. I couldn't confirm it because there wasn't a whole lot of info, but I thought I heard that ALF requires those headgear posts (whatever the correct term is) bonded around your teeth?

The Crane employee I emailed didn't reply when I asked if there's any more patient before/after photos besides X-rays, which was very disappointing considering the "years of testing" their site proclaims.

Trying to attach the photo keeps bringing up a message saying "the upload folder is full", so here it is:

10
Cranial Restructuring / Re: Ineresting Pictures
« on: April 30, 2017, 12:15:18 am »
Let us know what he says. One ortho i called had different rates for different services. He said $625 for him to oversee the entire crane treatment, and another amount (he didnt say) for them to just provide it along with modified retainers.

Do you mean retainers related to the Crane treatment? I emailed the Crane people a few days ago asking if a retainer is used for pulling with the Crane and they said the suggested appliance was a reverse pull version of ALF. (I'm trying to attach a photo of it, but keep getting an error message)

11
Cranial Restructuring / Re: The Maxilla Method
« on: April 30, 2017, 12:02:06 am »
From what I can tell, CP hasn't written a new post since January, and Neymarjr10 hasn't made any comments on the site since July of last year. I think it's now fair to surmise that Neymar's technique isn't the panacea he claimed, but I'm still curious about it. With all of the talk of preliminary minor surgical procedures, my best guess is that he combined temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) with extra oral traction (basically facepulling from micro-screws directly in the maxilla). Perhaps CP had one of his TSADs come loose from pulling too aggressively and that's why he would have required another surgery to continue. Since Neymar supposedly enrolled others to try his method, I wonder what changes they have achieved or if they also encountered problems.

Do you think my theory makes sense? I am envisioning securing a few micro-scews into the arch of the maxilla behind the lips, somehow affixing a removable facebow, and then using elastics to pull up and out on a crane/headgear. Does that sound feasible? Any ideas for how to make this operational?

A few commenters in the Maxilla Method articles seemed to give away the idea that anchorage devices were used in the treatment, so it is most likely something along those lines. I figured CP injured himself by pulling too much or too hard when his previous results hadn't solidified/healed yet. AFIAK, Neymar has no website and none of his supposed clients have said anything about trying his method out. I wouldn't trust him to deliver on either of those.

CP not writing since January can't really be blamed. After all, he's in the same boat as most everyone else and doesn't have all the answers, plus there's only so much to say about craniofacial dystrophy. He's still around to approve comments from somebody plugging their own guide for $39, which is kind of amusing.

Pages: [1]