Posted by: Progress
« on: June 17, 2017, 04:32:32 am »If that is the most convincing photo you could find, there's no way to convince anyone on this subject.
Do you realize how much camera settings influence the appearance of something as complex and intricate as the iris? How can you view that as a legitimate progress photo when the before photo has a brown/red tint and a flash while the second photo has a gray/blue tint with no flash. If you don't understand what I'm trying to say, take multiple photos of your eye in different environments with different settings with both flash and no flash. Not only will your eye color vary between gray and brown, they will even be red in some pics.
This is the little spoken dark side of the internet. Everyone can find a self-reinforcing echo chamber for their views. Do you know how many people believe blacks were the true kings of egypt or that Obama is a reptilian? Or that smoking cannabis cures cancer? People believe these things because they fail to analyze the validity of the claimed evidence. They believe what they want to believe the world to be like, not what it really is.
People go online and claim to have had results before they really have, like theno0n3 said, because they really believe in what they're trying to do and want to encourage others to do the same, no matter how they have not truly confirmed whether or not it even works in the first place. Same is true for mewing. I've been in this trap too. Which is why your subjective perception should never be trusted. You can think you're ugly or good looking depending on the state of your mind. Depressed people think they're hideous, manic people think they are gods among humans. To others it's irrelevant how your perception of yourself changes from day to day day. The only thing that matters is trying to keep the factors in before and after photos identical. Otherwise your efforts will never help anyone else than yourself at best.
Do you realize how much camera settings influence the appearance of something as complex and intricate as the iris? How can you view that as a legitimate progress photo when the before photo has a brown/red tint and a flash while the second photo has a gray/blue tint with no flash. If you don't understand what I'm trying to say, take multiple photos of your eye in different environments with different settings with both flash and no flash. Not only will your eye color vary between gray and brown, they will even be red in some pics.
This is the little spoken dark side of the internet. Everyone can find a self-reinforcing echo chamber for their views. Do you know how many people believe blacks were the true kings of egypt or that Obama is a reptilian? Or that smoking cannabis cures cancer? People believe these things because they fail to analyze the validity of the claimed evidence. They believe what they want to believe the world to be like, not what it really is.
People go online and claim to have had results before they really have, like theno0n3 said, because they really believe in what they're trying to do and want to encourage others to do the same, no matter how they have not truly confirmed whether or not it even works in the first place. Same is true for mewing. I've been in this trap too. Which is why your subjective perception should never be trusted. You can think you're ugly or good looking depending on the state of your mind. Depressed people think they're hideous, manic people think they are gods among humans. To others it's irrelevant how your perception of yourself changes from day to day day. The only thing that matters is trying to keep the factors in before and after photos identical. Otherwise your efforts will never help anyone else than yourself at best.


